<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google #1 Media Stock&#8230;.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/06/google_1_media_stock.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/06/google_1_media_stock.php?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=google_1_media_stock</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 00:36:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luca Conti</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/06/google_1_media_stock.php#comment-20856</link>
		<dc:creator>Luca Conti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2005 10:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/06/google_1_media_stock.php#comment-20856</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Google IPO was at 85$, not 75$ as reported by Hollywood Reporter.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google IPO was at 85$, not 75$ as reported by Hollywood Reporter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin Kelly</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/06/google_1_media_stock.php#comment-20855</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2005 17:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/06/google_1_media_stock.php#comment-20855</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;We&#039;re far to smart to wish for another NASDAQ run up like we had in 1999-2000 (remember how the index kept piling on 10% increases every single week?) - but we can at least have it all in one company.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That is quote of the year, John! Sooooo true.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We&#8217;re far to smart to wish for another NASDAQ run up like we had in 1999-2000 (remember how the index kept piling on 10% increases every single week?) &#8211; but we can at least have it all in one company.&#8221;</p>
<p>That is quote of the year, John! Sooooo true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
