Comments on: Google Moves Into Branding Business

By: araba

araba — Thu, 15 Nov 2007 20:14:06 +0000

we’ve been using a new software design that we created, called EMMA. Basically it allows students in first year composition (or any other English

By: Victor

Victor — Fri, 28 Sep 2007 23:01:08 +0000

Yeah mighty google, just move on and one of your biggest income, Adsense publishers… But for now i cant see the “GOOG” shares falling

By: sahibinden

sahibinden — Mon, 16 Jul 2007 00:52:37 +0000

I largely agree with Oliver, above. This is a slap at the big publisher’s using AdSense…

By: Business for sale

Business for sale — Fri, 30 Dec 2005 22:39:59 +0000

Thank you for adding

By: Admin

Admin — Sun, 25 Dec 2005 18:02:45 +0000

There are plenty of resources to learn to make brand progress.
Often times the issue is that many small business owners are wearing too many hats;
We would be honored if we could be added to this business blogger. We are from the World Business for sale is the leading independent businesses for sale listing service http://www.worldbusinessforsale.com/

By: Lance Schneider

Lance Schneider — Mon, 17 Oct 2005 18:20:53 +0000

I agree that Google sees its core business is in media. It is walking a fine line though of being a media company that has advertising and being an advertising company that syndicates media.

By: Russell Glass

Russell Glass — Mon, 25 Apr 2005 23:00:11 +0000

I'm not sure this move should come as a surprise, nor do I think it spells the end of Google as a search company. This is simply a natural and necessary evolution of how Google will continue to compete to make money while focusing on the stated mission: "organize the world's information and make it universally accessible and useful." After all, the more information they have indexed, the more users will need it, and the better the abiliy for advertisers to reach them in contextual ways.

I wrote a longer piece on it today, but there is an incredible future on the horizon for Google and the other search engines, and if it's advertising supported (or better yet, the user's choice), it is likely good for the user in the long run.

By: Saul Hansell

Saul Hansell — Mon, 25 Apr 2005 21:08:57 +0000

John-
Nervously, I like the idea that you can talk back about the way you were quoted in the paper. I will be the first to say journalism is an imperfect business, certainly no more perfect than the general state of communication between human beings. And my general experience is nobody likes the way they look in photos, nor how they sound on a tape recording, nor how they are quoted in the newspaper.

Still, in the spirit of 360 discussion, I think you are off base that I misstated the context of your comments. As it happens, I have been playing with a gizmo that records my phone calls as a backup in note taking. I didn

By: ID:entity

ID:entity — Mon, 25 Apr 2005 20:06:21 +0000

This was always on the cards for google – how else to expand your revenue growth without cannibalizing your own property.

As the advertiser tools & reporting become increasingly sophisticated, further consolidation will happen – the platforms win and become increasingly powerful each time a syndicate is swallowed.

By: Hashim

Hashim — Mon, 25 Apr 2005 17:33:07 +0000

Google's site says:
"Users have told us they are tired of seeing the same banner ads everytime they visit their favorite sites."

YEAH RIGHT!

They're lying, and that's evil