<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deeply Dumb, MSN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/02/deeply_dumb_msn.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/02/deeply_dumb_msn.php?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=deeply_dumb_msn</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bosco</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/02/deeply_dumb_msn.php#comment-21567</link>
		<dc:creator>Bosco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 16:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/02/deeply_dumb_msn.php#comment-21567</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I agree that the concept is pretty sophomoric-- with a &quot;conspiracy theorist&quot;, &quot;matchmaker&quot;, etc -- and the execution fairly shallow...  But with a marketing message to deliver (new search capabilities) and blogging starting to reach mainstream proportions, I can see MSFT&#039;s rationale for going in this direction.  As such, I wouldn&#039;t necessarily crown it as &quot;lame corporate marketing at it&#039;s worst&quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
What part(s) of it do you think are ill-conceived, and what would you do to create a more effective campaign?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the concept is pretty sophomoric&#8211; with a &#8220;conspiracy theorist&#8221;, &#8220;matchmaker&#8221;, etc &#8212; and the execution fairly shallow&#8230;  But with a marketing message to deliver (new search capabilities) and blogging starting to reach mainstream proportions, I can see MSFT&#8217;s rationale for going in this direction.  As such, I wouldn&#8217;t necessarily crown it as &#8220;lame corporate marketing at it&#8217;s worst&#8221;.<br />
What part(s) of it do you think are ill-conceived, and what would you do to create a more effective campaign?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jr</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/02/deeply_dumb_msn.php#comment-21566</link>
		<dc:creator>jr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 06:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2005/02/deeply_dumb_msn.php#comment-21566</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Sadly, even though it&#039;s getting the kind of attention normally reserved for slow motion train wrecks, it&#039;s still getting attention. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m betting that someone over at MSN marketing is probably dancing because of the spike in page views.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, even though it&#8217;s getting the kind of attention normally reserved for slow motion train wrecks, it&#8217;s still getting attention. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m betting that someone over at MSN marketing is probably dancing because of the spike in page views.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
