Comments on: We Test. No We Don't! http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/12/we_test_no_we_dont.php?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=we_test_no_we_dont Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more. Thu, 16 May 2013 04:38:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1 By: Oliver Thylmann http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/12/we_test_no_we_dont.php#comment-22443 Oliver Thylmann Tue, 07 Dec 2004 08:08:29 +0000 http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/12/we_test_no_we_dont.php#comment-22443 <p>See? Ross got it ;)</p> See? Ross got it ;)

]]> By: Ross@stapleton-gray.com http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/12/we_test_no_we_dont.php#comment-22442 Ross@stapleton-gray.com Mon, 06 Dec 2004 21:04:39 +0000 http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/12/we_test_no_we_dont.php#comment-22442 <p>1+1 = 3 for sufficiently (and not overly) large values of 1.</p> 1+1 = 3 for sufficiently (and not overly) large values of 1.

]]> By: Brian http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/12/we_test_no_we_dont.php#comment-22441 Brian Mon, 06 Dec 2004 21:00:27 +0000 http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/12/we_test_no_we_dont.php#comment-22441 <p>That is simply a method of weeding out folks who don't belong there.</p> That is simply a method of weeding out folks who don’t belong there.

]]> By: Oliver Thylmann http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/12/we_test_no_we_dont.php#comment-22440 Oliver Thylmann Mon, 06 Dec 2004 20:02:09 +0000 http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/12/we_test_no_we_dont.php#comment-22440 <p>I presume what he means is that passing the "test" is assumed. This is like the must have. How you pass it is another thing, and will show if you fit. 1+1 = 3 can be correct if argued correctly. :)</p> <p>Of course that is just an assumption.</p> I presume what he means is that passing the “test” is assumed. This is like the must have. How you pass it is another thing, and will show if you fit. 1+1 = 3 can be correct if argued correctly. :)

Of course that is just an assumption.

]]>