<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: News: Jeeves Stretches Out, Gets Personal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/09/news_jeeves_stretches_out_gets_personal.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/09/news_jeeves_stretches_out_gets_personal.php?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=news_jeeves_stretches_out_gets_personal</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:35:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Evans Lee</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/09/news_jeeves_stretches_out_gets_personal.php#comment-23081</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Evans Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2004 23:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/09/news_jeeves_stretches_out_gets_personal.php#comment-23081</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;My own testing of AJ against Google and Yahoo for my assorted sites shows incredible irrelevance. I&#039;m not complaining that I&#039;m not listed. Jeeves has indexed some of my sites heavily. One domain had to be go to a more expensive hosting plan because of the &quot;Jeeves  bot&#039;s&quot; hunger. But the results are silly. Sometimes the first link is to one of my affilate links. OK for making money but hardly the most relevant result. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And on some searches the paid, er, &#039;sponsored&#039; results are so thick that I didn&#039;t get to the real results until I hit the Page Down key. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;While Jeeves gives a couple of my sites a surprisingly high number of visitors I&#039;d no more use it for searching than I&#039;d ask Bertie Wooster for financial advice.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My own testing of AJ against Google and Yahoo for my assorted sites shows incredible irrelevance. I&#8217;m not complaining that I&#8217;m not listed. Jeeves has indexed some of my sites heavily. One domain had to be go to a more expensive hosting plan because of the &#8220;Jeeves  bot&#8217;s&#8221; hunger. But the results are silly. Sometimes the first link is to one of my affilate links. OK for making money but hardly the most relevant result. </p>
<p>And on some searches the paid, er, &#8216;sponsored&#8217; results are so thick that I didn&#8217;t get to the real results until I hit the Page Down key. </p>
<p>While Jeeves gives a couple of my sites a surprisingly high number of visitors I&#8217;d no more use it for searching than I&#8217;d ask Bertie Wooster for financial advice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Mehus</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/09/news_jeeves_stretches_out_gets_personal.php#comment-23080</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Mehus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2004 22:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/09/news_jeeves_stretches_out_gets_personal.php#comment-23080</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Also, don&#039;t forget: Ask Jeeves&#039; search results are the least relevant of the major search engines. Its own Teoma algorithmic search results are even less relevant, in my opinion.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t consider Ask Jeeves an innovator in the search space -- that&#039;s Yahoo! and Google&#039;s domain. The only thing Ask Jeeves does well is operating multi-brand Web portals on the cheap and continuing to increase its audience. It will never be a major player in search though.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This &quot;new&quot; product is something I&#039;d never use and is a complete waste of time, IMHO. It&#039;s a sham.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cheers,&lt;br /&gt;
Doug&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, don&#8217;t forget: Ask Jeeves&#8217; search results are the least relevant of the major search engines. Its own Teoma algorithmic search results are even less relevant, in my opinion.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t consider Ask Jeeves an innovator in the search space &#8212; that&#8217;s Yahoo! and Google&#8217;s domain. The only thing Ask Jeeves does well is operating multi-brand Web portals on the cheap and continuing to increase its audience. It will never be a major player in search though.</p>
<p>This &#8220;new&#8221; product is something I&#8217;d never use and is a complete waste of time, IMHO. It&#8217;s a sham.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Doug</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Zaharias</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/09/news_jeeves_stretches_out_gets_personal.php#comment-23079</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Zaharias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2004 20:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/09/news_jeeves_stretches_out_gets_personal.php#comment-23079</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Plus, I think their &quot;charity&quot; thing with the Red Cross is a total sham. Ask Jeeves is effectively donating their advertisers&#039; money, encouraging false clicks, and taking a tax write-off in the process. Bad.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plus, I think their &#8220;charity&#8221; thing with the Red Cross is a total sham. Ask Jeeves is effectively donating their advertisers&#8217; money, encouraging false clicks, and taking a tax write-off in the process. Bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Zaharias</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/09/news_jeeves_stretches_out_gets_personal.php#comment-23078</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Zaharias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2004 20:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/09/news_jeeves_stretches_out_gets_personal.php#comment-23078</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I see things much differently. Ask Jeeves drives a higher % of its searches to paid search click throughs than any other major search engine (70%+ vs &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see things much differently. Ask Jeeves drives a higher % of its searches to paid search click throughs than any other major search engine (70%+ vs </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/09/news_jeeves_stretches_out_gets_personal.php#comment-23077</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2004 16:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/09/news_jeeves_stretches_out_gets_personal.php#comment-23077</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;As you say, &quot; a future in which personal publishing is very much integrated into search, and vise versa&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Ultimately relevancy will be the winner when the engines can mine the cache of targeted groups. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A gigantic Epinions except the opinions will be backed by consensus from a dozen angles.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is an exciting time.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you say, &#8221; a future in which personal publishing is very much integrated into search, and vise versa&#8221;.</p>
<p>Ultimately relevancy will be the winner when the engines can mine the cache of targeted groups. </p>
<p>A gigantic Epinions except the opinions will be backed by consensus from a dozen angles.</p>
<p>This is an exciting time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
