<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tableau: Google for Structured Data?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/08/tableau_google_for_structured_data.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/08/tableau_google_for_structured_data.php?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=tableau_google_for_structured_data</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 12:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: note</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/08/tableau_google_for_structured_data.php#comment-23322</link>
		<dc:creator>note</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 12:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/08/tableau_google_for_structured_data.php#comment-23322</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Old articles seems more useful,&quot;We&#039;re going to take X, and make it easy to use&quot;. this right.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Old articles seems more useful,&#8221;We&#8217;re going to take X, and make it easy to use&#8221;. this right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Otis</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/08/tableau_google_for_structured_data.php#comment-23321</link>
		<dc:creator>Otis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2004 10:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/08/tableau_google_for_structured_data.php#comment-23321</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I agree.  Grokker, ThinkMap, and others are all very nice to look at, everyone&#039;s eyes open wide when they first see them, jaws drop sometimes, but I feel that in the end a tabular, ASCII or _simple_ GUI displays work best.  On the other hand, some of these companies have managed to survive for a long time, so somebody must be buying their products.  Another company in this space is Antartica Systems (http://www.antarctica.net/), where Tim Bray used to be the CTO.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  Grokker, ThinkMap, and others are all very nice to look at, everyone&#8217;s eyes open wide when they first see them, jaws drop sometimes, but I feel that in the end a tabular, ASCII or _simple_ GUI displays work best.  On the other hand, some of these companies have managed to survive for a long time, so somebody must be buying their products.  Another company in this space is Antartica Systems (<a href="http://www.antarctica.net/" rel="nofollow">http://www.antarctica.net/</a>), where Tim Bray used to be the CTO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Otis</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/08/tableau_google_for_structured_data.php#comment-23320</link>
		<dc:creator>Otis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2004 10:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/08/tableau_google_for_structured_data.php#comment-23320</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I agree.  Grokker, ThinkMap, and others are all very nice to look at, everyone&#039;s eyes open wide when they first see them, jaws drop sometimes, but I feel that in the end a tabular, ASCII or _simple_ GUI displays work best.  On the other hand, some of these companies have managed to survive for a long time, so somebody must be buying their products.  Another company in this space is Antartica Systems (http://www.antarctica.net/), where Tim Bray used to be the CEO.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  Grokker, ThinkMap, and others are all very nice to look at, everyone&#8217;s eyes open wide when they first see them, jaws drop sometimes, but I feel that in the end a tabular, ASCII or _simple_ GUI displays work best.  On the other hand, some of these companies have managed to survive for a long time, so somebody must be buying their products.  Another company in this space is Antartica Systems (<a href="http://www.antarctica.net/" rel="nofollow">http://www.antarctica.net/</a>), where Tim Bray used to be the CEO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kendall Willets</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/08/tableau_google_for_structured_data.php#comment-23319</link>
		<dc:creator>Kendall Willets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2004 04:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/08/tableau_google_for_structured_data.php#comment-23319</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Over the years, the database tools market has been beaten down into a fine powder, so I wouldn&#039;t bother much with yet another data visualization tool.  There&#039;s an entire phylum of startups based on &quot;We&#039;re going to take X, and make it easy to use&quot;, where X = data mining, DNA mapping, quantum mechanics, filtering pron out of battellemedia.com, or whatever.  Most fail.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the years, the database tools market has been beaten down into a fine powder, so I wouldn&#8217;t bother much with yet another data visualization tool.  There&#8217;s an entire phylum of startups based on &#8220;We&#8217;re going to take X, and make it easy to use&#8221;, where X = data mining, DNA mapping, quantum mechanics, filtering pron out of battellemedia.com, or whatever.  Most fail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
