<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Responds To Gmail Privacy Issues: The Higher Standard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/05/google_responds_to_gmail_privacy_issues_the_higher_standard.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/05/google_responds_to_gmail_privacy_issues_the_higher_standard.php?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=google_responds_to_gmail_privacy_issues_the_higher_standard</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 04:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/05/google_responds_to_gmail_privacy_issues_the_higher_standard.php#comment-23972</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2004 09:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/05/google_responds_to_gmail_privacy_issues_the_higher_standard.php#comment-23972</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m using gmail as my online library now... It&#039;s great.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m using gmail as my online library now&#8230; It&#8217;s great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hisyam</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/05/google_responds_to_gmail_privacy_issues_the_higher_standard.php#comment-23971</link>
		<dc:creator>hisyam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2004 19:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/05/google_responds_to_gmail_privacy_issues_the_higher_standard.php#comment-23971</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;they scan your emails ofcoz.. duh!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they scan your emails ofcoz.. duh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.Y.</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/05/google_responds_to_gmail_privacy_issues_the_higher_standard.php#comment-23970</link>
		<dc:creator>A.Y.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2004 06:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/05/google_responds_to_gmail_privacy_issues_the_higher_standard.php#comment-23970</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Really?  Then, how do spam-filters work?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really?  Then, how do spam-filters work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/05/google_responds_to_gmail_privacy_issues_the_higher_standard.php#comment-23969</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2004 10:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/05/google_responds_to_gmail_privacy_issues_the_higher_standard.php#comment-23969</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Not sure if these guys are being honest! BTW not all web based email operate to the same degree of privacy invasion - worth checking on this! &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure if these guys are being honest! BTW not all web based email operate to the same degree of privacy invasion &#8211; worth checking on this! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dereck</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/05/google_responds_to_gmail_privacy_issues_the_higher_standard.php#comment-23968</link>
		<dc:creator>dereck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2004 09:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/05/google_responds_to_gmail_privacy_issues_the_higher_standard.php#comment-23968</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;AH! I think I know the google groups thing, they are launching google groups 2 in a little while. They are probly moving all the data over to the new system. i have seen a lot of broken posts on google groups lately too.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And they have indead kept the juice in geographical advertising. I have heard nothign to the contrary at least.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AH! I think I know the google groups thing, they are launching google groups 2 in a little while. They are probly moving all the data over to the new system. i have seen a lot of broken posts on google groups lately too.</p>
<p>And they have indead kept the juice in geographical advertising. I have heard nothign to the contrary at least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/05/google_responds_to_gmail_privacy_issues_the_higher_standard.php#comment-23967</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2004 18:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/05/google_responds_to_gmail_privacy_issues_the_higher_standard.php#comment-23967</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Google apparently has bigger issues to address than their GMail privacy policy.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Take Google Groups (please!): this major sector of the Google empire has apparently been out of commission since May 27 (the last date of Usenet messages posted at Google Groups). Yet there is not one word of explanation available from Google.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As a publicly held company, Google will need to handle such events in a more forthcoming and timely way. Ignoring them will not please Wall Street investors, who are looking for Google to be a legitimate, well-run business.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google apparently has bigger issues to address than their GMail privacy policy.</p>
<p>Take Google Groups (please!): this major sector of the Google empire has apparently been out of commission since May 27 (the last date of Usenet messages posted at Google Groups). Yet there is not one word of explanation available from Google.</p>
<p>As a publicly held company, Google will need to handle such events in a more forthcoming and timely way. Ignoring them will not please Wall Street investors, who are looking for Google to be a legitimate, well-run business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos Roche</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/05/google_responds_to_gmail_privacy_issues_the_higher_standard.php#comment-23966</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos Roche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2004 03:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/05/google_responds_to_gmail_privacy_issues_the_higher_standard.php#comment-23966</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Is Gmail gonna take us closer to geographical online advertising? &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Gmail gonna take us closer to geographical online advertising? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
