http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/04/privacy_advocates_suspend_plans_for_gmail.php?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=privacy_advocates_suspend_plans_for_gmail Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more. Thu, 16 May 2013 04:38:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1 http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/04/privacy_advocates_suspend_plans_for_gmail.php#comment-24586 Ofertas de empleo Sat, 10 Apr 2004 10:36:00 +0000 http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/04/privacy_advocates_suspend_plans_for_gmail.php#comment-24586 <p>To the being a free service every person is free to use it. If a user does not want that they invade his privacy, not use this service.</p> To the being a free service every person is free to use it. If a user does not want that they invade his privacy, not use this service.

]]> http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/04/privacy_advocates_suspend_plans_for_gmail.php#comment-24585 John Blossom Wed, 07 Apr 2004 19:15:17 +0000 http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/04/privacy_advocates_suspend_plans_for_gmail.php#comment-24585 <p>With all due respect to privacy experts, while privacy management concerns regarding Gmail are legitimate, this is an inevitable direction that content must take if it is to become more responsive to the interests of its audences. My sense of it is that there is a middle ground between perfectly private email and correspondence that one is willing to expose in limited ways in exchange for contributing to a group knowledgebase that takes links and interests into account when tracking down relevant content. Related thoughts on our own site:<br /> <a href="http://shore.com/commentary/weblogs/2004_04_01_m_archive.html#108127099403347540" rel="nofollow">http://shore.com/commentary/weblogs/2004_04_01_m_archive.html#108127099403347540</a></p> With all due respect to privacy experts, while privacy management concerns regarding Gmail are legitimate, this is an inevitable direction that content must take if it is to become more responsive to the interests of its audences. My sense of it is that there is a middle ground between perfectly private email and correspondence that one is willing to expose in limited ways in exchange for contributing to a group knowledgebase that takes links and interests into account when tracking down relevant content. Related thoughts on our own site:
http://shore.com/commentary/weblogs/2004_04_01_m_archive.html#108127099403347540

]]>