<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DIY Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/04/diy_search.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/04/diy_search.php?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=diy_search</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 04:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Mace</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/04/diy_search.php#comment-24324</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Mace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2004 23:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2004/04/diy_search.php#comment-24324</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I tried Gigablast based on your link. So far, I&#039;m not impressed with the quality of the search results, as compared to Google. So where&#039;s the beef? And exactly what makes Gigablast&#039;s search algorithm better?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried Gigablast based on your link. So far, I&#8217;m not impressed with the quality of the search results, as compared to Google. So where&#8217;s the beef? And exactly what makes Gigablast&#8217;s search algorithm better?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
