<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Australia&apos;s Answer to Google? Nah.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2003/12/australias_answer_to_google_nah.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2003/12/australias_answer_to_google_nah.php?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=australias_answer_to_google_nah</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 12:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Battelle</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2003/12/australias_answer_to_google_nah.php#comment-25229</link>
		<dc:creator>John Battelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2003 21:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2003/12/australias_answer_to_google_nah.php#comment-25229</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I tried a few old standards - for me anyway. The search I know best is of course the vanity search (&quot;John Battelle&quot;), after that, I tried &quot;google IPO&quot; and &quot;how Mooter works&quot;. All turned up less than stellar results. I am not sure how this site plans to compete. But maybe we&#039;ll hear from them...I&#039;m increasingly thinking this site does not merit the attention we&#039;re giving it here...!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried a few old standards &#8211; for me anyway. The search I know best is of course the vanity search (&#8220;John Battelle&#8221;), after that, I tried &#8220;google IPO&#8221; and &#8220;how Mooter works&#8221;. All turned up less than stellar results. I am not sure how this site plans to compete. But maybe we&#8217;ll hear from them&#8230;I&#8217;m increasingly thinking this site does not merit the attention we&#8217;re giving it here&#8230;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hashim</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2003/12/australias_answer_to_google_nah.php#comment-25228</link>
		<dc:creator>Hashim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2003 21:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://battellemedia.com/archives/2003/12/australias_answer_to_google_nah.php#comment-25228</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That is the funniest mission statement I have ever read! Thanks for the find, John. Which searches did you try, by the way?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is the funniest mission statement I have ever read! Thanks for the find, John. Which searches did you try, by the way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
