Recent Comment
Spotlight
- Reader Michael Megalli writes: It is difficult to engage in genuine conversations with the marketplace when you can't change the reality of how a company does business, what it sells, how it works with partners, etc. [go]
Recent Comments
- Andrew S: " Ads on Google's home page would not hurt ..." [go]
- John Weir: " Great post John. I'm running some cour ..." [go]
- nmw: " wow -- that almost makes the sohbet spam ..." [go]
- me@home.com: " Hi John, great book. Great blog. Great t ..." [go]
- nmw: " Chris, maybe not on HotBot.COM or Googl ..." [go]
- Chris Kilkes: " An old cliche comes to mind, "what's old ..." [go]
- Sarah Worsham: " Interesting idea, but doesn't seem to wo ..." [go]
- seo results: " Interesting, so kinda like what Ask.com ..." [go]
- nmw: " >> This means than more than a third, if ..." [go]
- Dan Keldsen: " John - we're currently running a researc ..." [go]
- Jim: " Hi John, I have been reading this blog f ..." [go]
- Faisal Segu: " Seems to me we need to connect these "bi ..." [go]
- JG: " Google's new motto: Gaudy and relevant ..." [go]
- JG: " Sooner or later, people will catch on ..." [go]
- prefabrik ev: " Looking a blinking, moving, las vegas st ..." [go]
- JG: " nmw: you may notice that many (indeed ..." [go]
PERFECT FOR THAT PERSON WITH EVERYTHING
Order 'The Search'
Yup, it makes the perfect gift for that officemate or colleague who you thought had everything....including you! If you order here, I promise to sign it, assuming we can figure out the shipping...
You can also buy the audio version here.
Check my book page for more info.
Blogger's Rights
Top Posts
- The Database of Intentions (or how this all got started)
- From Pull to Point(or the first post where I riff on the "Point-To Economy")
- Google As Builder (or the point at which Google stopped being simply a search engine)
- On Google v. Yahoo
- TV and Search Merge
- On Sell Side Advertising
- Battelle Gets Searchstreams
- Search and Immortality
- Toward the Endemic (on endemic advertising)
More coming soon...
Active Topics
- 35 comments: WTF??!!! (04.17)
- 26 comments: Twitter. Oh God. (04.30)
- 14 comments: The Future of Search Series (05.08)
- 14 comments: The Music In Magazines (05.07)
- 12 comments: Google to Go Big With TV Ads (04.14)
Monthly Archives
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
About John Battelle
Searchblog Newsletter
Enter email to subscribe to Searchblog's newsletter:
Calendar
| Su | Mo | Tu | We | Th | Fr | Sa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Syndicate
Powered by
March 26, 2008 1:51 PM
Google: Patterns in the Click Fraud Cloud
A short post on the Google blog about how the company uses log files to ferret out click fraud. Worth noting ....
- Posted by John Battelle on March 26, 2008 1:51 PM



Comments
Click fraud is an on going problem that needs to be monitored. My problem is that
I do not have any clicks therefore no monitoring is needed.
Google’s recent defending theme was “open social open social open social”, How to outsource protocol design for free? How to crawl other SN data? Social Workgroups working hard for them!
Google’s new theme “Privacy Privacy Privacy”
It is good to see that Google changed their motto. Google previously said, Click fraud is “self-correcting”. Now "Protecting our advertisers against click fraud is a lot like solving a crime"
But, Having a crime platform, defending it by privacy practice is questionable.
There are logged in users, these user clicks are most likely real clicks, fraud clicks are visible. There is Google toolbar, Cookies.. are they using these to detect click fraud? Moreover, Click programs uses botnet, are they tracking botnets? or having partnership with anyone to detect it? Do they outsource click fraud to third party?
their spying applications uses lot of techniques to uniquely identify users and companies all over the world but not their click detecting system...
How many patterns they found? Ten thousand? Twenty thousand? One hundred? Or one or two?
clicks fraud happening for many years, why suddenly Google coming forth and telling something? Looks like people (advertisers/pub) started to ask lot of questions!
Would advertisers ever escape from this black hole?
*YAWN* ....
If Google was so sincerely worried about click fraud, you would NOT have waited until SearchEnginesWeb insisted that you remove the entire clickable colored area in the sponsor links - to finally do so
REALLY sophisticated click fraud technology allows for the 'Spoofing' of that referral data
Some use various proxies - including online proxies - to cover their click fraud tracks
Some companies act as outsourcees of clicks - meaning they have many different PCs with different resolutions and many different spoofed proxies to cover their tracks
Click fraud is a much bigger problem than Google or Yahoo or MSN are acknowledging.
Those who have had #1 or #2 rankings for reasonably competitive search terms on the organic SERPs and purchased Sponsor links for those SAME terms, can attest to the dramatic difference in traffic as well as the amount of time spent on the site by each visitor.
None of the top search engines really care about click fraud until it becomes an embarrassing controversy. Their Ad departments look only at the revenue that is generated from their PPCs and try to convince their board of directors that their technologies are so profitable.
It is to their advantage to frame their output in the best possible light and get the best ROI until they get 'outed'.
Then they go into PR mode and make whatever modifications are needed to silence their critics.
Everyone only cares about their individual paycheck; they care nothing about the Advertisers.
This scenario has been played MILLIONS of times in the past!
Leave a comment