Reader Niall writes: Facebook seems a lot less hot than when Mark was on stage a year ago. Many key employees, including co-founders, have left the company. What is Facebook doing to remain an employer of choice in Silicon Valley? »
Yup, it makes the perfect gift for that officemate or colleague who you thought had everything....including you! If you order here, I promise to sign it, assuming we can figure out the shipping...
You can also buy the audio version here.
Check my book page for more info.
Enter email to subscribe to Searchblog's newsletter:
More coming soon...
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial- NoDerivs 2.5 License.
Powered by:
Movable Type 4.1
All contents copyright © 2003 - 2008 John Battelle. | Terms of Service and Privacy Policies
Comments
Now - if my baby realnames.com was still alive you could just say the keyword instead of calling out links :-)
Maybe I should resusitate it. Hmmmm
Keith Teare
Om writes: "For a nominal fee of say a $1 a month, they should offer us ability to erase our search behavior every week."
While I agree with the spirit of Om's post, it really bothers me that we would have to pay extra to stop a search engine company from doing something that costs them extra, to begin with. It would be cheaper for the search engines not to cache any queries because they wouldn't have to buy all the extra hard drives, and more processors to handle the caching and the data management.
So why should it cost me anything, for them to save even more money? A premium service, in my mind, should be the one where I explicitly ask them to cache my queries so that I can make use of them, personally, later. The default, non-premium service should be the one in which they don't spend the extra hardware, software, and electricity costs caching all my queries.
Leave a comment