Recent Comment
Spotlight
Recent Comments
- gaurav: " I am seriously impressed with your knowl ..." [go]
- Ray P.: " Another Me Too! Did what most ..." [go]
- bill: " It still has to be good search. I tried ..." [go]
- nmw: " Please connect these dots: 1. CBS + CNe ..." [go]
- nmw: " AFAIK, Google's focus is on being a prof ..." [go]
- John Battelle: " @Sam: You have a point, but I worry, ALO ..." [go]
- John Battelle: " I am not sure this is only a gimmick. Mo ..." [go]
- Michael Cohn: " No matter who owns the ad server in ques ..." [go]
- stone: " It's a terrible idea, widely criticized ..." [go]
- Adam: " Ok, I've waited for headlines, but all I ..." [go]
- Sam: " See, this guy made some derogatory and v ..." [go]
- Polyester Kabin: " eyvallah saolasın eline sağlık : ) ..." [go]
- John Battelle: " Thanks Sean, good idea. We are pretty mu ..." [go]
- Sean Ammirati: " John, I attended your last event in San ..." [go]
- BuyRosevillePottery.com: " You should DEFINITELY complain. Even if ..." [go]
- JG: " Air travel in the US is starting to f ..." [go]
PERFECT FOR THAT PERSON WITH EVERYTHING
Order 'The Search'
Yup, it makes the perfect gift for that officemate or colleague who you thought had everything....including you! If you order here, I promise to sign it, assuming we can figure out the shipping...
You can also buy the audio version here.
Check my book page for more info.
Blogger's Rights
Top Posts
- The Database of Intentions (or how this all got started)
- From Pull to Point(or the first post where I riff on the "Point-To Economy")
- Google As Builder (or the point at which Google stopped being simply a search engine)
- On Google v. Yahoo
- TV and Search Merge
- On Sell Side Advertising
- Battelle Gets Searchstreams
- Search and Immortality
- Toward the Endemic (on endemic advertising)
More coming soon...
Active Topics
- 26 comments: Twitter. Oh God. (04.30)
- 17 comments: Can Yahoo Get the Search Monkey Off Its Back? (05.15)
- 16 comments: The Future of Search Series (05.08)
- 16 comments: The Music In Magazines (05.07)
- 15 comments: Google. Does. Not Market. Except When It Does. (05.15)
Monthly Archives
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
About John Battelle
Searchblog Newsletter
Enter email to subscribe to Searchblog's newsletter:
Calendar
| Su | Mo | Tu | We | Th | Fr | Sa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Syndicate
Powered by
August 31, 2005 8:44 AM
Google Injects AdWords Into Magazine Market. Q: Why? A: Money.
This scoop from Cnet sure caught my eye:
Google is expanding its lucrative Internet advertising network into the print world in a bold attempt to capture traditional ad dollars.
The search king, which makes 99 percent of its revenue from Internet ads, is quietly testing the waters of print advertising sales, according to executives at several companies that have bought the ads. Google recently began buying ad pages in technology magazines, including PC Magazine and Maximum PC, and reselling those pages--cut into quarters or fifths--to small advertisers that already belong to its online ad network, dubbed AdWords.
This certainly has nothing to do with search. An image of the ads is here.
This feels like a revenue diversification play, to be sure - selling directories and marketplace ads is always the next step once a publisher exhausts the low hanging fruit of its core offerings - but I wonder what the real agenda is here. Does Google see an opportunity to, in essence, become the middleman for anywhere from one to ten pages of directory/marketplace ads in nearly every B2B and niche magazine in the world?
Of course it does. And why not? It has the infrastructure in place (as I said in my previous excerpt, the most valuable asset it has after their tech is its network of advertisers). Let's see. The Cnet piece said that the advertisers paid Google $1000 for their ads in PCMagazine. There were five of these advertisers - so $5K. The manufacturing/distribution cost of that page is probably no more than a grand, so that's $4K in profit to split between Google and the publishers of PC Magazine. Let's say the split is 70/30. That's $1200 to Google, and $2800 to the publisher. As with the online world, this is free money for the publisher, and they probably love it.
Now, $1200 a page, say an average of five pages per B2B magazine, at least 1500 viable B2B mags in the country (probably more, but....), so do the math, that's $1200 times 5 times 1500, that's, er, $9 million, and that's one issue. Say the average B2B magazine comes out 18 times a year (some are monthly, some weekly, some biweekly etc.), that's $162 million in revenue a year, the vast majority of that pure profit. And that's just to start.
Yeah, I see how that might be interesting to Google. And to publishers who, in the end, are never very good at monetizing the back of their book.
For now, this feels like a test. But this sure as heck doesn't feel like a groovy, engineering-driven, throw-it-against-the-wall kind of test. This is a test of a very real opportunity.
Update: Google sent me a statement, thin soup, but here you go:
Google is testing a program to place ads from our advertising network
into U.S. print publications. This limited test is part of Google's
continuing effort to develop new ways to provide effective and useful
advertising to advertisers, publishers and users.
- Posted by John Battelle on August 31, 2005 8:44 AM
TrackBack
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Google Injects AdWords Into Magazine Market. Q: Why? A: Money.:
» Googleã?ŒæŠ€è¡“雑誌ã?®åºƒå‘Šãƒ¯ã‚¯ã‚’å†?販 - 広告代ç?†åº—事æ¥ã?¸ã?®å¸ƒçŸ³ã?‹ from Zopeジャンã‚ー日記
John Battelle's Searchblog : Google Injects AdWords Into Magazine Market. Q: Why? A: Money.
http://battellemedia.com/archives/001824.php
Googleã?ŒæŠ€è¡“雑誌ã?®åºƒå‘Šãƒšãƒ¼ã‚¸ã‚’è²·ã?„å?–ã?£ã?¦ã€?コマ切れã?«ã?—ã?¦AdWordsã?®é¡§å®¢ã?«å†?販ã?™ã‚... [Read More]
- Tracked on August 31, 2005 4:44 PM
» Google Theories - How GoogleNet, VoIP, Cost-Per-Call, and Localized Search May Tie Together from Allen Tsai - Technology in Motion
Speculation about Google’s future plans.
... [Read More]
- Tracked on September 3, 2005 8:05 AM
» Inefficient Markets... from SEO Book.com
Andrew Goodman posts about how inefficiently offline marketing is sold. [Read More]
- Tracked on October 1, 2005 2:49 PM



Comments
"This certainly has nothing to do with search."
John, I disagree. Theoretically (don't know whether it works like that already) Google could use its technology to search for those upcoming magazine/newspaper articles with a context/content that fits a certain ad.
That would require Google to link to the editorial databases of major news outlets, but it might work. It's not a classic end user search scenario. But one might still call it search. It's Googling the papers for media/ad planners.
As a journalist, I find the idea somewhat scary....
Thomas I do agree with you. It's just a search modification. Google has the power to send people to the news outlets. But I don't see the point for that cause the added audience will only be the one that doesn't see adds on google.
mesothelioma activists
i dont know japan. english translate please :(
i cant read 3 post above
nice one
Sevgi Ve AÅŸk Platformu SanaSevdam.Net
thanks
Leave a comment